UK was right not
to join flawed euro,
admits Jacques Delors
Times - 17 Jan 2004
By Charles Bremner in Paris and Greg Hurst
Jacques Delors, the former President of the European
Commission, fuelled the controversy over the euro yesterday
by admitting that Britain was justified in opting out
of the single currency because its launch was flawed.
In a remarkably frank interview with The Times, the one-time
bogeyman of Eurosceptics also predicted that Britain would
stay out for years, not least because Gordon Brown was
so passionate about his contempt for Europe.
In another startling admission, the veteran French leftwinger
said that the European Union was in a state of latent
crisis because of weak leadership. He blamed member
state leaders, including President Chirac of France, for
putting national interests before the common good.
M Delors, 78, also spoke with unexpected admiration of
Baroness Thatcher, his old nemesis. He said that she was
a figure who counts in British and European
history, and the way her Conservative colleagues dumped
her was an example of the atrocious manner
in which male politicians treat female colleagues.
But his most surprising comments were on the euro. He
lamented that EU leaders had failed to heed his warning
that monetary union must be matched with close co-ordination
of economic policies, and argued that the euro was consequently
less attractive than it could have been.
Since we have not succeeded in maximising the economic
advantages of the euro, one can understand the British
. . . saying, Things are just fine as they are.
Staying out of the euro hasnt stopped us prospering,
he said.
Denis MacShane, the Minister for Europe, said M Delors
comments, vindicated the Governments sensible
decision . . . to make economic conditions rather than
ideology the central issue as far as the euro is concerned.
But Michael Ancram, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, said:
This is an extraordinary admission by M Delors.
If a champion of European integration says that the euro
hasnt worked, it shows how right Britain has been
to stay out, doubly so if a more harmonised economic policy
is proposed as the way forward.
M Delors led the Commission for ten years, pushing through
both the single market and the 1991 Maastricht treaty
on monetary union, and has just published his memoirs.
He spoke warmly of Britain, though he called its aversion
to Europe a great mystery of history. But
he was sharply critical of his own country. He deplored
the opposition in France to the EUs imminent enlargement
and President Chiracs attempts to lay down the law
to the former Soviet bloc states because of their pro-American
leanings.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk
British workers close productivity
gap with US and surge ahead of Germany
FT - 17 Feb 2004
By Anna Fifield
The UK's workers are more productive than their German
counterparts and have started to close the gap on rivals
in the US, it emerged yesterday after revised 2002 figures
showed that UK productivity was higher than had been previously
thought.
British productivity in 2002 was only 12.8 per cent lower
than the average for the rest of the Group of Seven industrialised
nations, markedly better than the 16.5 per cent gap that
was estimated six months ago, according to revised figures
issued by the Office for National Statistics.
The revised figure is a sharp improvement on the 15.8
per cent difference recorded in 2001 and will cheer Gordon
Brown, the chancellor, who has placed a high priority
on narrowing the productivity gap but whose efforts had
apparently met with limited success.
The gain was particularly marked against the US, where
the gap shrank between the gross domestic product per
worker in the two countries. Economists believe productivity
is determined by the interplay of a complex set of factors
such as skills, research and development, and the economic
cycle.
The initial estimates showed the US had extended its
margin from 28.9 per cent in 2001 to 30.8 per cent the
following year but the revisions showed that in fact it
had narrowed to 27.4 per cent. The revisions also showed
that Britain was stealing a march on Germany. The first
set of comparisons put German output 4.6 per cent ahead
but the revisions show that Britain actually had a 1.2
per cent advantage.
The ONS reissued its productivity comparisons yesterday
in the wake of new international price data issued by
the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The outlook could be even rosier, because the figures
cover a period when the growth in British productivity
was weak. Since 1980 productivity growth has averaged
2 per cent a year, but over the past two years it has
been 1.4 per cent.
George Buckley, an economist at Deutsche Bank, forecast
productivity growth would hit 2.5 per cent by the middle
of the year. "The rise in growth we are expected
to see this year is not expected to be met by the equivalent
rise in employment, so you would expect productivity growth
to pick up," he said.
Mr Brown has labelled productivity growth a yardstick
for economic performance and a Treasury spokesman said
yesterday that efforts to tackle the productivity gap
were starting to pay off. "Our continued macro-economic
stability and micro-economic reforms are contributing
to an improvement in performance," the Treasury said.
http://www.ft.com
Joining euro 'would wreak havoc
on housing'
Telegraph - 3 Mar 2003
UK 'four times as sensitive to fluctuations in interest
rates'
By David Litterick
BRITAIN'S adoption of the single currency would wreak
havoc on the housing market, according to an independent
think-tank in a study that has intensified the war of
words between those for and against the euro.
The report, by Oxford Economic Forecasting (OEF), suggests
that the UK is four times as sensitive to interest rate
changes because of the differences in the structure of
the UK housing and mortgage markets.
The research, commissioned by the "No" campaign,
looks at the effect of monetary policy on the housing
market - both inside and outside the eurozone - and concludes
that the UK economy would be far more vulnerable inside
the euro to shocks in consumer confidence affecting the
housing market.
It cites the much higher level of variable rate mortgage
borrowing in the UK compared with the eurozone, where
fixed-rate borrowing is the norm. The report claims that,
if the UK had joined the euro at the outset, two years
of above-trend growth would have pushed house prices 30pc
higher than they are now, sent the current account deficit
ballooning by an extra pounds 50 billion and caused inflation
of 4pc. That would then give way to a technical recession
- two successive quarters of negative growth - leading
to further cycles of boom and bust, which the Chancellor
is aiming to eradicate.
OEF forecasts that a one percentage point rise in interest
rates for two years would slash gross domestic product
by 2pc if the UK were within the euro, compared with a
fall of just 1/2 pc for the eurozone as a whole. George
Eustace, director of the "No" campaign, said:
"The British housing market represents a major obstacle
to UK membership of the euro. Higher interest rate sensitivity
in Britain is not just a short-term issue regarding the
economic cycle. It reflects fundamental structural differences
which simply won't change in the foreseeable future. If
we give up the ability to set our own interest rates,
we will have no way of reacting to changes in the property
market."
Britain in Europe described the research as "flying
in the face of common sense". Philippe Legrain, the
lobby group's chief economist, said: "According to
the two most authoritative economic studies of the issue
by the Bank of England and the IMF, the British economy
is no more sensitive to interest changes than euro-zone
economies.
"Nor is the current state of the housing market
an obstacle. The Bank expects house prices to stabilise
over the next two years. This would allow UK interest
rates to fall to euro levels - leading to cheaper mortgages
and borrowing for all Britons without sparking inflation."
© Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk